One of the things about the early community of academic bloggers that I’m
so nostalgic for (nostalgic enough that I should know to be a little
self-critical here) is that it was pretty small, and so could be pretty
intentional. And even so, problems arose. Maintaining the care exercised
in a known community while remaining open to other voices and inputs is an
issue that the next wave of distributed but interconnected communication
platforms are going to need to face head-on.
Well, I think this is why I really like Webmentions as an expression of intention.
In order to send one, you need to have your own blog. And you need to link back
to the post. (AND, technically, you need your post laid out with microformats!)
This acts as a kind of wall around the garden. It acts like a gate. If you’ve got
the code, you can get in. But likely you’re going to move on. There are just so
many other places to harass and cause mischief on the web today. (Contrast with
the massive silo gardens—if you are a member, you have all access to everyone
there.)
I think a great benefit of social media could be that it provides an outlet for
the masses so that careful enclaves can still be formed on the open web. I mean,
look, there will always be bad actors in a group—groups seem to have a half-life
where they grow too big and destabilize, the birth of a whole new era of drama and
rage.
As for discovery, I think every blog needs a list of links to other blogs in their
community. It’s like your friend list, but can be so much better than that. I want
to read what you’re thinking, but I also want to know where else the discussion is
happening.
Webrings are opaque; I can’t see where I’m headed. But a link list (blogroll, whatever)
is like a gift.
This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?
You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.
Reply: Feeds and Gardens
Well, I think this is why I really like Webmentions as an expression of intention. In order to send one, you need to have your own blog. And you need to link back to the post. (AND, technically, you need your post laid out with microformats!)
This acts as a kind of wall around the garden. It acts like a gate. If you’ve got the code, you can get in. But likely you’re going to move on. There are just so many other places to harass and cause mischief on the web today. (Contrast with the massive silo gardens—if you are a member, you have all access to everyone there.)
I think a great benefit of social media could be that it provides an outlet for the masses so that careful enclaves can still be formed on the open web. I mean, look, there will always be bad actors in a group—groups seem to have a half-life where they grow too big and destabilize, the birth of a whole new era of drama and rage.
As for discovery, I think every blog needs a list of links to other blogs in their community. It’s like your friend list, but can be so much better than that. I want to read what you’re thinking, but I also want to know where else the discussion is happening.
Webrings are opaque; I can’t see where I’m headed. But a link list (blogroll, whatever) is like a gift.