Rss readers have some of the same features as email clients, but I’d rather have all my subscribed sites in a different place than my inbox. As it is I’m already subscribed to too many discussion lists with high traffic. The best ones have bookmarklets or extensions that will let you subscribe to a feed extremely easily. Inoreader also has the feature where you can create feeds for pages without them, I think. I don’t use it so I’m not sure.
Could we use RSS for more?
I’m wondering lately if there’s a better way to do ‘readers’. Like you say, once
you are monitoring 100s of sites, it’s disgusting to log in each day and see 100s of
unread posts. I’m wondering if there’s something that could give me an overview
of all the activity that’s going on out there, so I can then decide what to
read. No ‘unread’ counts, no notifications.
And, rather than having a big feed of recent activity, have a list of
all the ‘bloggers’/‘writers’ so I can see who’s active—maybe with a little
graph of how much is going on with them, maybe a list of recent post titles or
something…
Makes me think of the Peach social network, where the ‘inbox’ was names of
people who had updated—you could then go in and view their stuff. It was never
presented as a big newsfeed or a big inbox of individual posts.
This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?
You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.
Reply: Beyond Readers?
Could we use RSS for more?
I’m wondering lately if there’s a better way to do ‘readers’. Like you say, once you are monitoring 100s of sites, it’s disgusting to log in each day and see 100s of unread posts. I’m wondering if there’s something that could give me an overview of all the activity that’s going on out there, so I can then decide what to read. No ‘unread’ counts, no notifications. And, rather than having a big feed of recent activity, have a list of all the ‘bloggers’/‘writers’ so I can see who’s active—maybe with a little graph of how much is going on with them, maybe a list of recent post titles or something…
Makes me think of the Peach social network, where the ‘inbox’ was names of people who had updated—you could then go in and view their stuff. It was never presented as a big newsfeed or a big inbox of individual posts.