My filtering is not a stand alone thing in isolation, it is part of a network of filters, yours, mine, and other people’s. My output is based on filtered input, and that output ends up in other people’s filtered input.I treat blogging as thinking out loud and extending/building on other’s blogposts as conversation. Conversations that are distributed over multiple websites and over time, distributed conversations.
Cripes! I think this is the best essay I’ve read on how to read the Web. I agree with all of it.
I am definitely going to read this article several times before properly
responding to it. But this is insanely rich stuff. I completely agree with and
recognize the entire filtering strategy as my own. Feeling some kinship there.
As for the feed reader, it’s even worse: my own prototype
(Fraidycat) is very
close to what you describe. I assign feeds ‘importance’ levels that are much
like ‘social distance’—I’m trying to decide if that term nails it for me. I’m
not sure yet! It’s a good one, though.
I think the one area where I am not sure is still having to deal with a ‘news
feed’-type stream of posts in each of those folders—is that your ideal way
of reading? I feel like it focuses too much on recency. I’ve been enjoying just
seeing a pulse of recent activity and then needing to visit their site to
actually take it in (and perhaps explore further).
I definitely feel like the ‘social distance’ thing has helped crystallize why I
put certain people into different ‘importances’—and it’s not just because they
are actually more ‘important’ (like: to the universe). Anyway, brilliant!!!
This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?
You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.
Reply: Feed Reading By Social Distance
Cripes! I think this is the best essay I’ve read on how to read the Web. I agree with all of it.
I am definitely going to read this article several times before properly responding to it. But this is insanely rich stuff. I completely agree with and recognize the entire filtering strategy as my own. Feeling some kinship there.
As for the feed reader, it’s even worse: my own prototype (Fraidycat) is very close to what you describe. I assign feeds ‘importance’ levels that are much like ‘social distance’—I’m trying to decide if that term nails it for me. I’m not sure yet! It’s a good one, though.
I think the one area where I am not sure is still having to deal with a ‘news feed’-type stream of posts in each of those folders—is that your ideal way of reading? I feel like it focuses too much on recency. I’ve been enjoying just seeing a pulse of recent activity and then needing to visit their site to actually take it in (and perhaps explore further).
I definitely feel like the ‘social distance’ thing has helped crystallize why I put certain people into different ‘importances’—and it’s not just because they are actually more ‘important’ (like: to the universe). Anyway, brilliant!!!