The problem is that Blogspam is now a (legitimate) industry much bigger than
Google can manage.
Google Search became a playground for marketing firms to dump content made
by low-paid freelancers with algorithmically chosen keywords, links and
headers. It’s SEO on large scale. Everything is monitored via analytics and
automatically posted to Wordpress. Every time Google tweaks its algorithm to
catch it, they’re able to A-B test and then change thousands of texts all at
once.
Personal blogs can’t even dream about competing with that.
In fact, those companies are actively competing with personal blogs by
themselves: via tools like SEMRush and social media monitoring, they know
which blogs are trending and use their tools to produce copycat content
re-written by freelancers and powered by their SEO machine.
I know a startup that is churning 10 thousand blogposts per day on clients
blogs, each costing from 2 to 5 dollars for a freelancer to write according
to algorithmically defined parameters.
Just wait until they get posts written via OpenAI-style machine learning:
the quality will be even lower.
Not only that: there’s no need for black hat SEO anymore. Blogposts from
random clients have links to others clients blogs, and it is algorithmically
generated in order to maximize views and satisfy Google’s algorithm. They
have a gigantic pool of seemingly unconnected blogs to link to, so why not
use it.
The irony is that companies buy this kind of blogspam to skip paying
AdSense. Why pay when you can get organic search results? So not only
they’re damaging the usefulness of the SERP, they’re directly eating
Google’s bottom line. These blogs also have ZERO paid advertising inside
them, since they’re advertising themselves.
That’s the reason Bing, DuckDuckGo and Yandex still have “old web” results.
That puts Google in a very difficult position and IMO they’re not wrong to
fight it.
Well, I disagree. (Though I think your record of things is correct!) Certainly
if you look at this as a bot war then Google’s actions make sense: we need our
bots to outsmart the ‘bots’ (human bots even!) that are writing blogs.
But look at it another way: you have lots of humans writing - and it’s all of
varying quality. Why not let the humans decide what’s good? The early Web was
curated by humans, who kept directories, Smart.com ‘expert’ pages, websites and
blogrolls that tried to show where quality could be found. Google’s bot war (and
the idea that Google is the sole authority on quality) eliminated these valuable
resources as collateral damage.
This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?
You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.
Reply: Not Google’s Fault
Well, I disagree. (Though I think your record of things is correct!) Certainly if you look at this as a bot war then Google’s actions make sense: we need our bots to outsmart the ‘bots’ (human bots even!) that are writing blogs.
But look at it another way: you have lots of humans writing - and it’s all of varying quality. Why not let the humans decide what’s good? The early Web was curated by humans, who kept directories, Smart.com ‘expert’ pages, websites and blogrolls that tried to show where quality could be found. Google’s bot war (and the idea that Google is the sole authority on quality) eliminated these valuable resources as collateral damage.