[wrt to my conversations with philosopher.life] I’m curious what modality you use to converse? Am I missing some fun bit of something about that wiki?
How do you converse with a wiki?
Yeah—it’s quite hidden. We’ve been calling it hyperconversation. It’s very
informal and fluid. It’s completely simple: just leaving messages for
each other on our sites. No Webmentions necessary or anything like that.
We’re actually trying to really push this concept right now. So there’s this
sprawling group chat going on between my blog, philosopher.life, sphygm.us and
wiki.waifu.haus for the last few weeks, going through December. The master thread is right
here.[1]
You might be tempted to say that using Webmentions would improve the chat
because it would give us notifications. But I’m not so sure! The great thing
about doing a chat like this is that you really have to keep up on each person’s
wiki (or blog), because messages could be hidden anywhere. With Webmentions,
you would read their reply and move on. (Think of how, in your reply, you had
to reference this
article
for me—but there is probably a lot more relevant material on your site—I
know this is true, just because you do a lot of metadiscussion about blogging
and online conversation.)
If you and I were to chat this way, we basically mutually agree to dig deep into
each other’s blogs. Think of how this contrasts to ‘the temporality of social
media’ that you mention.
Chris:
We’re being trained to dip our toes into a rapidly flowing river and not focus
on deeper ideas and thoughts or reflect on longer pieces further back in our
history.
Taking this a level deeper, social is thereby forcing us to not only think
shallowly, but to make our shared histories completely valueless.
This is absolutely what we’re trying to figure out too, in our own way. Here’s
a summary of what this group (the ‘public self-modelers’) is doing:
Cross-wiki chats get compiled and placed in permanent pages so that they can
be referred back to and built upon.
Each individual works on writing master pages for specific concepts (Find The
Others has been a topic that
we’ve fleshed out together) or even for
specific people (such as h0p3’s page on
Sphygmus or my page on h0p3.)
These personal pages are just good fun - a reminder that the point of our conversation isn’t
just to explore a topic, but to get to know each other and goof around.
Because conversations and chats span months and months (compared to a Twitter
thread, which may last only a few days,) even the ‘ephemeral’
threads are pretty solid, because a lot of thinking and back-and-forth have
gone into them.
Since we’re not using a rigid protocol (like ActivityPub or microformats,)
we can shape the conversation however
we want. (For example, at one point we decided to start using each other’s
colors when quoting - I think this was Sphygmus’ idea - so we worked on
‘whostyles’ - you can see them on my Hypertext%20%20 page. So we don’t
really care about protocols. We care about messing with the hypertext.
They’ve each done a lot of work tweaking their wikis. So there’s an aesthetic
component.) So we’re not just work on permanent writing - but long-term
design/art projects, too.
People seem very focused on technological solutions to online communication
(ActivityPub, Indieweb, this absurd BlueSky idea), but the hyperconversation
approach is trying to prove that the problem is a human problem. If you read and
listen to each other and try to respond thoughfully and carefully - and try to
find your own style and wee innovations along the way - you start to feel like
you don’t need anything more complicated than a TiddlyWiki!
That’s been a very stunning realization for me. (As I’ve been an Indieweb
zealot as well, of course.) Thank you for your curiosity and for your excellent
blog and for your work on improving the Web! You are one of the main writers
that I feel has been keeping the Web healthy. You connect a lot of people,
Chris. That’s human work.
Right now you have to weed through it all, but I will be publishing a
finalized, edited chat on my home page when it’s over. ↩︎
This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?
You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.
Reply: The Hyperchat Modality
How do you converse with a wiki?
Yeah—it’s quite hidden. We’ve been calling it hyperconversation. It’s very informal and fluid. It’s completely simple: just leaving messages for each other on our sites. No Webmentions necessary or anything like that.
We’re actually trying to really push this concept right now. So there’s this sprawling group chat going on between my blog, philosopher.life, sphygm.us and wiki.waifu.haus for the last few weeks, going through December. The master thread is right here.[1]
You might be tempted to say that using Webmentions would improve the chat because it would give us notifications. But I’m not so sure! The great thing about doing a chat like this is that you really have to keep up on each person’s wiki (or blog), because messages could be hidden anywhere. With Webmentions, you would read their reply and move on. (Think of how, in your reply, you had to reference this article for me—but there is probably a lot more relevant material on your site—I know this is true, just because you do a lot of metadiscussion about blogging and online conversation.)
If you and I were to chat this way, we basically mutually agree to dig deep into each other’s blogs. Think of how this contrasts to ‘the temporality of social media’ that you mention.
This is absolutely what we’re trying to figure out too, in our own way. Here’s a summary of what this group (the ‘public self-modelers’) is doing:
People seem very focused on technological solutions to online communication (ActivityPub, Indieweb, this absurd BlueSky idea), but the hyperconversation approach is trying to prove that the problem is a human problem. If you read and listen to each other and try to respond thoughfully and carefully - and try to find your own style and wee innovations along the way - you start to feel like you don’t need anything more complicated than a TiddlyWiki!
That’s been a very stunning realization for me. (As I’ve been an Indieweb zealot as well, of course.) Thank you for your curiosity and for your excellent blog and for your work on improving the Web! You are one of the main writers that I feel has been keeping the Web healthy. You connect a lot of people, Chris. That’s human work.
Right now you have to weed through it all, but I will be publishing a finalized, edited chat on my home page when it’s over. ↩︎