On some hypothetical future niche directory it’s that webring code that
prevents the linkrot. As long as the webring/directories robot keeps
finding that validation code you stay in the directory, no code and
eventually you will be dropped. Not perfect but it automates the process a bit.
Ok, yeah—this will be essential. I wonder if I can use the page’s title tag
for this? Like: save the title tag the first time I check the site. Because it’s
much less rare for the title tag to change than the body text.
I like the idea of the webring code. I just don’t have any influence on some of
the sites that I am linking to. But yeah: mixing webrings and Indieweb.xyz is
interesting.
As for the size of a directory (or webring), that is such a big problem on the
Web. They need to have upper limits, for sure. If it gets too big, it feels (and
does become) unusable. If it’s too large, then nothing in it is special. Like
with these “awesome lists”—you are led to believe that the list is a severe
abridgement, because the links in it are truly impressive.
With webrings, someone is special by virtue of discovering the ring first. So
I can see closing admittance. I’m not that into webrings because it’s a pretty
fragile link between all parties.
I’d like linking to take some effort, which also limits the amount of links you
can have and makes them more potent.
Thanks for the ideas! Great stuff.
This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?
You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.
Reply: Brad’s Comment on ‘The Awesome Directories’
Ok, yeah—this will be essential. I wonder if I can use the page’s title tag for this? Like: save the title tag the first time I check the site. Because it’s much less rare for the title tag to change than the body text.
I like the idea of the webring code. I just don’t have any influence on some of the sites that I am linking to. But yeah: mixing webrings and Indieweb.xyz is interesting.
As for the size of a directory (or webring), that is such a big problem on the Web. They need to have upper limits, for sure. If it gets too big, it feels (and does become) unusable. If it’s too large, then nothing in it is special. Like with these “awesome lists”—you are led to believe that the list is a severe abridgement, because the links in it are truly impressive.
With webrings, someone is special by virtue of discovering the ring first. So I can see closing admittance. I’m not that into webrings because it’s a pretty fragile link between all parties.
I’d like linking to take some effort, which also limits the amount of links you can have and makes them more potent.
Thanks for the ideas! Great stuff.