Hopefully over time the feed will involve fewer articles about the IndieWeb.
I mean, assuming we want more people to be interested, if not get involved;
the harsh truth for us nerds is that most people don’t have the time or energy
for mastubatory musings.
@simonwoods I’m guilty of a ton of navel-gazey,
unchecked wankery of that type, even though
I initially found that part of Indieweb pretty off-putting. (And the “blogosphere”
that came before it.)
It’s an unfortunate thing that we have to do so much meta-discussion to make
progress. But I guess when I look around at all the decrying of social media
and silo-stuffing (you know, writing posts for Reddit) going on out there,
I start to wonder if maybe that energy is best put into shameful blogging about
blogging. I don’t know why such an act is so much more shameful than blogging about
skiing, recipes or rash prevention—but it truly, truly is.
(Oh and @eli—thank you for making an attempt to crosspost
to Indieweb.xyz. Never seen one from a micro.blog and you should be good now.)
This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?
You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.
Reply: Indiewebwebwebindieindie
@simonwoods I’m guilty of a ton of navel-gazey, unchecked wankery of that type, even though I initially found that part of Indieweb pretty off-putting. (And the “blogosphere” that came before it.)
It’s an unfortunate thing that we have to do so much meta-discussion to make progress. But I guess when I look around at all the decrying of social media and silo-stuffing (you know, writing posts for Reddit) going on out there, I start to wonder if maybe that energy is best put into shameful blogging about blogging. I don’t know why such an act is so much more shameful than blogging about skiing, recipes or rash prevention—but it truly, truly is.
(Oh and @eli—thank you for making an attempt to crosspost to Indieweb.xyz. Never seen one from a micro.blog and you should be good now.)