Using these isolated services make it hard for us to express ourselves in the days of MySpace (for my generation) or even further back. It has created ingenuity in terms of content production within these constraints but the act of being forced in a box for the sake of revenue reeks of that post-industrial content creation farms.
Your blog has been a big inspiration to me because of its design. Part of it is
that you’ve used color and photography to craft a unique place. It’s nothing
like a ‘a revenue box’—it’s like a lovely novel that stands out on the shelf.
And it goes beyond aesthetics and colors—it’s well-structured. (I really like
the metadata section you have on each post. The layout is appealing and it makes
me want to explore your site.) Sure, if I’m posting all pictures all day, then
Instagram might have everything I need. But what if I’m writing essays and
conducting interviews—I want to have the freedom to structure that data so
people can find their way around. (In a way, I’m saying that I want to own the
‘algorithm’—I want to just do it by hand.)
And, yeah, I was using Jekyll, too—and left it partly because I want to start
doing more blogging outside of the console. I think the Indieweb toolset is
still so far behind social media’s—this is why people generally don’t hang
out here.
I don’t know what existed before hashtags outside of
planets but those two
concepts were ways to find people and content on things you were interested
in. Reddit’s plumbing is built around this notion. Twitter is
compartmentalized around this notion too. Even platforms built on the notion
of decentralization and federation uses a centralizing tactic of federating
hashtag content to build community. It’s a bit inevitable.
Really great observation here. You’re right—we don’t have a way of tagging and
community forming in the Indieweb. I have been building Indieweb.xyz as a way to kind of
do this—but it’s hard to know if the approach is right, it hasn’t managed to
draw people in. Maybe we need a crawler you can sign up for that will index all
your tags and hook us all together.
This thought of yours also brought me to the
rel=tag
page, which I hadn’t seen before. Not sure what to do with it. Perhaps brid.gy
could start adding these hashtags to syndicated posts? Don’t really know.
This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?
You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.
Reply: Where Will the Current State of Blogging and Social Media Take Us?
Your blog has been a big inspiration to me because of its design. Part of it is that you’ve used color and photography to craft a unique place. It’s nothing like a ‘a revenue box’—it’s like a lovely novel that stands out on the shelf.
And it goes beyond aesthetics and colors—it’s well-structured. (I really like the metadata section you have on each post. The layout is appealing and it makes me want to explore your site.) Sure, if I’m posting all pictures all day, then Instagram might have everything I need. But what if I’m writing essays and conducting interviews—I want to have the freedom to structure that data so people can find their way around. (In a way, I’m saying that I want to own the ‘algorithm’—I want to just do it by hand.)
And, yeah, I was using Jekyll, too—and left it partly because I want to start doing more blogging outside of the console. I think the Indieweb toolset is still so far behind social media’s—this is why people generally don’t hang out here.
Really great observation here. You’re right—we don’t have a way of tagging and community forming in the Indieweb. I have been building Indieweb.xyz as a way to kind of do this—but it’s hard to know if the approach is right, it hasn’t managed to draw people in. Maybe we need a crawler you can sign up for that will index all your tags and hook us all together.
This thought of yours also brought me to the rel=tag page, which I hadn’t seen before. Not sure what to do with it. Perhaps brid.gy could start adding these hashtags to syndicated posts? Don’t really know.